Wed April 09,
2003 11:36 AM ET
For Additional Articles
Nick Olivari, Correspondent
click on: Media Index
NEW YORK, April 9 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones industrial average
.DJI has gained 11 percent since its most recent
low, and at least one follower of a stock market gauge known as
the Dow Theory is optimistic there may be a major "buy" signal
in view.Dow theorists argue that gyrations in the 30-stock
industrial average indicate a market trend when backed up by a
similar move in the 20-stock Dow Jones transportation average
.DJT .
"We have held above the lows, and now turned back up," said
Jack Schannep, editor of the TheDowTheory.com, who has been
following the theory since 1960. "If we go above (the most
recent highs) on the Dow industrials and the Dow transports, it
will declare a Dow Theory market 'buy'."
The Dow Theory, named after Wall Street Journal co-founder
Charles Dow, has been around for a century and is based on Dow's
writings and observations where he split the industrial and
railroad stocks into two separate averages.
The rationale is that railroad or transport companies move
raw materials to manufacturing companies, or the industrials,
and then transport the finished products to places of sale.
For the economy to be healthy, both sectors have to be
utilized and that will be seen by moves in related stocks.
A cornerstone of technical research, the theory has advanced
from Dow's time and now focuses on the eponymous transportation
average -- which includes railroads, airlines, sea container
shipping companies, and truckers.
A NEW BUY
In getting more bullish, Schannep takes the most recent lows
from March 11 -- where the Dow industrials closed at 7,524.06
and the Dow transports were at 1,942.19 -- as a retest of what
some see as the October 2002 market bottom.
Since then, although both averages have pulled back, they
held above those lows and have turned higher.
"The higher highs situation with higher lows, is a classic
uptrend," Schannep said.
Confirmation of a new "buy" signal, according to Schannep,
will come when the Dow average rises above 8,521.97, its March
21 closing high, and the transportation average closes above
2,263.49, its most recent closing high, again on March 21.
The Dow industrials traded up 0.6 percent to 8,354.95 on
Wednesday, while the transportation average rose 0.9 percent to
2,220.62 in late morning trading.
One problem, though, is that not all Dow theorists
necessarily see the same thing, at the same time.
Rich Moroney, editor of Dow Theory Forecasts, which has been
publishing since 1946, argues that the market's primary trend is
still bearish.
While the industrial average held its October 2002 closing
low during the most recent downtrend, Moroney notes, the
transportation average broke through it's Oct. 9, 2002, low --
signaling the bear market may still have room to run.
"If the industrial average trends below 7,286.27 (the Oct. 9
closing low) it will confirm the bear market," Moroney warned.
Schannep acknowledged that he is more aggressive on "buy"
signals than other theory followers arguing that with the speed
of technological innovation and communication today, things just
"happen more rapidly than they did previously."
RELEVANCE
To be sure, some say Dow Theory may not be as reliable or
even relevant as it was a century ago. The U.S. economy has
become more focused on services, as manufactured goods became
cheaper to assemble overseas where labor is less expensive.
That means sectors like banking, securities services and
computer software have a greater impact on the U.S. economy than
makers of refrigerators and washing machines.
Others argue that while the Dow Theory has an underlying
economic argument, technical analysis itself is fundamentally
flawed.
"There is a compelling theory underlying it, but it's still a
pattern-based technical analysis," said Charles Kaplan, chief
executive of Equity Analytics, a Web-based economics and
statistical consulting firm. "It's not a good way to make money
in the long term unless you know when it's going to be right or
wrong."
Schannep dismisses the criticism. He emphasizes the theory
will not indicate the duration or extent of any move in stocks,
but rather whether they are a "buy" or a "sell."
There may be two or three signals a year or none at all, he
said. The "buy" signal in December 1990 was not reversed until
August 1998, and almost exactly coincided with the longest
economic expansion in U.S. history.
|